Jump to content




Hag's NoLimits rides

b&m coaster knex

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Old_Hag

Old_Hag

    Lead Engineer

  • 2205 posts

Posted 24 September 2012 - 08:31 PM

I've been in a bit of an NL rampage lately because I just figured out Newton2 (as you probably already know). Anyway, I just finished my first coaster using newton that wasn't a "test". What do you think?


Posted Image



This thread probably wont be updated often, but every once in a while I'll post a ride.


#2 Coasteradict

Coasteradict

    The hate sign

  • 1883 posts

Posted 24 September 2012 - 08:50 PM

Pretty decent attempt for your first proper newton coaster but I would recommend for your next ride that uses such a long train would be to try not to exceed 3.5g's and -0.5g's as Newton treats the train as a point object, but No Limits treats the train (correctly) as an extended object, so whilst you may have all the forces correct in Newton when you use a longer train it will skew the forces so that the front and back trains will sometimes get some nasty spikes in the forces (as was present) and nobody wants to be experiencing +5g's for such a long period of time like on the first turn and then continue to get spikes of it later in the ride.

On the coaster itself. It was fairly good with some decent support work and you almost always get good track work from newton. However I felt the layout was lacking quit a bit IMO, as it was just 50-80* banked turn--couple of straight air hills--banked turn--air hills. You need to mix it up, try some low to the ground quick transitions, some helix's or an overbanked turn (if you're doing a layout like i305 have low to the ground overbanks with the banking starting at about 5* or in a layout like this try the taller versions).

Good attempt though 7/10 :)

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Thanks Immelmann

#3 CW5X

CW5X

    Wha?

  • 3579 posts

Posted 25 September 2012 - 10:06 AM

I have to agree with what's been said above. This ride looked very intense. Probably a bit too intense for a normal rider just because of the few long instances of 5 Gs. The trackwork seems pretty smooth as you would expect from Newton 2 but yes mix it up a bit. The supports however do look epic especially on the first drop and I quite like the lake landscape as well. It could be improved but since you just figured out Newton 2 (something which I found very hard to manage and in some instances, still haven't managed), a very good effort I think has been produced.

Silverstar Nemesis Poseidon Air Saw The Swarm Nemesis Inferno Colossus ​RageThe Smiler Oblivion Shockwave GeForce Apocalypse Detonator Kumali Mumbo Jumbo Atlantica Supersplash Velocity Blue Fire Megacoaster Pepsi Max Big One Wodan


See No Limits and K'nex here


If only I had more space/pieces. Delete as appropriate

Tyndrum


#4 Old_Hag

Old_Hag

    Lead Engineer

  • 2205 posts

Posted 24 May 2013 - 04:14 PM

I made a new coaster, as you may have seen in the longest thread...This started out just as a test to see if I could make a drop like the one you will see in the video:




#5 Witting

Witting

    Lead Engineer

  • 1077 posts

Posted 28 May 2013 - 02:22 PM

Looks very good i could see someone build a knex coaster like this in a few months.

Posted Image
^ thank you CCI

Inversion count: 110
http://www.coastercounter.com/witting

#6 RideOnKI

RideOnKI

    BANNED

  • 233 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 07:12 PM

Try out the new tool FVD++! http://lucasbosch.de...ools/?dir=FVD++
(Its the FVD0_51.zip file)
Its like Newton 2 only better! But slightly harder!

Your coasters are looking good Hag! :)

Also, just because it is smooth doesn't mean its good.

Your track should be shaped appropriately to the manufacturer of the ride your creating.

And the support work should be accurate to the manufacturer as well.

Edited by RideOnKI, 03 June 2013 - 07:26 PM.