GADV 2005...What will it be?
#161
Posted 27 August 2004 - 07:23 PM
'range'. I live in Michigan and tons of people go to Florida for the parks
own there. Or are you trying to say that Florida is in the 'range' of
Michigan citizens?
If people don't go to parks out of their
'range' then I guess this new coaster won't have a big draw since it
will only attract people from the 'range' of the park.
2003 - Thunder Twist | Iron Falcon | Insanity | Voltage | Banshee
2004 - Centaur | Polar Plunge | Chaos | Nessie | Eclipse | Desert Eagle
2005 - K2 | Jaguar
#162
Posted 27 August 2004 - 10:10 PM
People from all over know of them and visit them. Also, when people plan vacations to
a popular spot, they tend to find the parks there. Vacations are definatly different.
People round here go to Florida, but still don't know much. They refer to Dr.
Doom's Freefall as Doom Drop. Most people in my area refer to SFMM as
simply SF. They don't even know there are other SF's. So range has a lot
to do with it, except when the widely known parks and vacations.
#163
Posted 27 August 2004 - 10:12 PM
school hear in Maryland know about it...
#164
Posted 27 August 2004 - 11:12 PM
hours..idiot
CC
.:Zoom.Zoom.Forever:.
#165
Posted 27 August 2004 - 11:39 PM
in and reiterate that SFSTL statement I made eariler. Yesterday my supervisor called
me up and told me that several ride ops had told him, that Mike (the head of ride
operations) had told them that they would be the leads for "the new superman
coaster next year".
Wanna start any speculation on that?
-Tyrant
#166
Posted 27 August 2004 - 11:58 PM
people go to parks in Florida. And if people go out of their 'range' for
world wide parks, I don't think they will go to ride this new coaster because the
park isn't a 'world wide park'. Therefore, no one will go out of their
range to ride this ride because they only know of the Six Flags park in their
'range' and have never heard of any others. Plus, record breakers are not
advertised nation wide. Only Enthusiasts hear about them so it isn't like this will
draw crowds from otehr 'ranges' anyway.
(I know how stupid
this all sounds but I just love finding holes in your argument )
2003 - Thunder Twist | Iron Falcon | Insanity | Voltage | Banshee
2004 - Centaur | Polar Plunge | Chaos | Nessie | Eclipse | Desert Eagle
2005 - K2 | Jaguar
#167
Posted 28 August 2004 - 10:08 AM
would be much better spendind 10 to 15 mil on a good, more unique rocket coaster
instead of spending 25+ mil on a taller rip off of ttd. They both would get th same
publicity, and one is cheaper than the other. Even most entusiests wont want to ride
this ride as much as ttd simply because its not as revolutionary as ttd was. Its like
when SD2000 beat MF, It might of been the tallest coaster but it wasnt as big a deal
as MF because MF already took the big step in braking 300ft. But as all your facts
are true, it doesnt look like gadv is thinking the same things as you....
#168
Posted 28 August 2004 - 11:02 AM
Force/Magnum/Wild Thing/Mamba, etc. Millennium Force had totally new concepts
and elements. Less people are going to come ride this than TTD because there is
nothing special about it.
2003 - Thunder Twist | Iron Falcon | Insanity | Voltage | Banshee
2004 - Centaur | Polar Plunge | Chaos | Nessie | Eclipse | Desert Eagle
2005 - K2 | Jaguar
#169
Posted 28 August 2004 - 11:44 AM
from other parts of the country to ride this ride, nor did I say that it would be better to
build it taller rather than unique. Besides, the ride length is shorter than TTD, so it
would be interesting for it to be taller. What I have been trying to say is that they will
get a ton of people, as much as TTD because of three reasons: GP eat up world
records, GP don't know of TTD even if they do (which you have been arguing)
than they will still want to ride the tallest coaster in the world, and finaly Enthusiasts
will want to claim that they rode the tallest coaster in the world. As for there being
nothing special about it, think: WORLD RECORD. Of course it will be special.
My ultimate point is that anything that breaks the world record, will draw huge
crowds and will be special, no matter what.
#170
Posted 28 August 2004 - 12:53 PM
argument. If I am a member of the GP that lives 5 hours from both CP and SFGADV,
I have been to both parks once, and had a choice to go to one again. Would I choose
SFGADV which has a coaster that looks exactly like TTD (To the GP it will), but they
had a horrible experience at SFGADV due to poor ride ops, the park being dirty, gum
everywhere, etc., or would they want to go to CP the park with 16 roller coasters,
'The greatest roller coaster in the world' (according to amusement today),
a clean friendly park, with resorts on site.
I am sorry, SF is making a huge
mistake putting this in SFGADV. It is way to close to TTD, and SFGADV
doesn't even compare to CP.
Most of the people that I know, know
about TTD and CP, but not from me, but from other people visiting the park and
having an overall good experience. As for you guys thinking Intamin has perfected
their launch they haven't. SR experiences a lot of downtime, and it seems to be
getting worse as the year goes on. SFGADV does not have the staff to take care of
this ride, and the rest of the park. Their will be many people coming from SFGADV
dissapointed, not from the ride breaking down, but from the overall experience of the
park. SF needs to get their head out of their butt and relize that they need to start
taking a look at guest relations instead of packing 15 roller coasters in all of their
parks.
#171
Posted 28 August 2004 - 01:35 PM
so... *sniff* beautiful . unlike their park. six flags
is the pimp of parks, looks attractive good coasters but the second you get deeper in
the park (drop the pimp analogy RIGHT NOW YOU PERVES) you notice that its a
dump.........
-matt-
#172
Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:01 PM
correct. It would have worked better in another park farther away but, this is not
about SF being dirty. Peeps 'round here love one day @ SFMM more than 3
days @ DLR & Knott's. The GP can stand the uncleanliness. Despite
eveything y'all are sayin (some stuff havin' good arguments), a record
breaker like this WILL BRING IN GUESTS. Some guests will still go to CP, but the
majority will want to try the new coaster.
I personaly don't think this
will break the record, but rather a new design that is more than: Launch, Tophat,
Breaks.
#173
Posted 28 August 2004 - 09:52 PM
you stated, than how will people find out about this 'record breaker' if they
never found out about TTD when it broke the records? How can you say that the GP
don't care about cleanliness? I hate it how people like you think you can
generalize and say that the GP thinks this and that when there is no such thing as
GP! Some people know lots about coasters and others don't know that
much but everyone is different and you can't generalize. If Disney Parks were
dirty and trashed would people say, "I don't care, I just want the
rides!"...No! Maybe some would say that but many people do care
and other may not but you cannot generalize and say that the GP does this.
2003 - Thunder Twist | Iron Falcon | Insanity | Voltage | Banshee
2004 - Centaur | Polar Plunge | Chaos | Nessie | Eclipse | Desert Eagle
2005 - K2 | Jaguar
#174
Posted 28 August 2004 - 11:34 PM
ONCE did I "state" that people didn't know about TTD. The GP
within the area (to which I have been refering to the whole time) will know because
they know what is goin' into their home parks and because SF will advertise this
thing to death.
Once again, you twist my words. I never said the GP
don't care about cleanliness, I said they could STAND it. And, you cannot
compare Disney and SF. Disney relies on ambiance, family atmosphere, and
cleanliness to bring in guests, while SF relies soley on thrills, which is why the GP can
STAND it.
Maybe you don't want to catagorize them as the
"GP" but that is what they are, the "General Public". I am
catogorizing the "GP" as those who aren't informed about coasters.
You don't have to catagorize them as that, and that is ok, but respect my right to
call them what ever the h-e-double hockey sticks I want.
One more thing,
you give the GP WAY too much credit. These are the people who get X & Deja
Vu confused. These are the people who ask if Top Thrill Dragster's fake smoke
is real and these are the people who answer: Yes, the wheels spin so fast it makes
smoke. These are the people who call ALL inversions Loop-de-loops or corkscrews.
These are people who don't know jack about coasters, but pretend they do
anyway.
Geese, I think I just popped a vein...
#175
Posted 29 August 2004 - 06:02 AM
that was what this topic needed- making fun of those who as costakid said, cocky,
know it nothing general public. yes i understand that ALL of the things CK said are
true, its just that you shouldnt make fun of those people, for 20%(watev) of our
population or more have GP for Parents, i was just quizzzing my dad on what the
transfer tracks were called and he said "lift hill". im not saying your
wrong, its just that most of who we know are gp-and get a bandaid costakid
-matt-
#176
Posted 29 August 2004 - 08:57 AM
AM
[b]One more thing, you give the
GP WAY too much credit. These are the people who get X & Deja Vu
confused. These are the people who ask if Top Thrill Dragster's fake smoke is
real and these are the people who answer: Yes, the wheels spin so fast it makes
smoke. These are the people who call ALL inversions Loop-de-loops or corkscrews.
These are people who don't know jack about coasters, but pretend they do
anyway.
</div><!-
-QuoteEEnd-->
This is what I mean. Just because you hear people talking
about stupid things people say in line and how some people call inversions
loop-de-loops you assume that everyone is like that. And now you are saying that
people only go to SF for thrills, then why is there sections devoted to kids if the GP
only goes there fopr thrills? I highly doubt that SF relies soley on thrills to attract
customers or maybe they do and that is why they are losing money. It is a well known
fact that families spend a lot more money in parks than thrill seekers do so I really
doubt your statement that SF relies on thrills for customers. Once again, you are
generalizing by making it seem like all the GP are retarded people. Maybe the people
in your 'range' are just retarded 'GP'
2003 - Thunder Twist | Iron Falcon | Insanity | Voltage | Banshee
2004 - Centaur | Polar Plunge | Chaos | Nessie | Eclipse | Desert Eagle
2005 - K2 | Jaguar
#177
Posted 29 August 2004 - 11:33 AM
can compete with DLR. It just doesn't happen. Maybe other SF don't but
MM does.
When it comes to theme parks, the GP is
"retarded" as you so eliquently put it. Like I said before you give the GP
WAY too much credit.
That being said, we can stop arguing about the GP
issue because we obviously won't sway each other. So, lets agree to dissagree.