#21
Posted 03 January 2009 - 10:38 PM
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Watch My Coasters!
MaXair732865 (9:31:57 PM): seriously, i need a really compact layout
TehMike23 (9:32:07 PM):drop, loop, diveloop, zero-g, up into break run, helix..
MaXair732865 (9:32:12 PM): im not going to post this, dont worry
TehMike23 (9:32:15 PM): cockscrew, then station
MaXair732865 (9:32:28 PM): cockscrew? what the hell is that?
MaXair732865 (9:32:44 PM): sexuall? Innuendo much?
MaXair732865 (9:32:55 PM): Dang
TehMike23 (9:33:06 PM): ahahahah
My Top 5 Coasters
1-Maverick
2-Top Thrill Dragster
3-Millenium Force
4-Griffon
5-Apollos Chariot
#22
Posted 03 January 2009 - 10:43 PM
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#23
Posted 03 January 2009 - 10:54 PM
^thanks.
More comments please find something wrong with it.
#24
Posted 03 January 2009 - 11:19 PM
#25
Posted 03 January 2009 - 11:24 PM
SSCoasters Staff
The SSCoasters Forum Rules
GigaSonic XLC, Déjà Vu, Werewolf, WildSide, Thunderhawk, Kaibutsu, Diamondback, Couloir
SVengeance|Voyage|LightningRod|Goliath(SFGAm)|OutlawRun|Fury325|RF2|Taron|StormChaser|Orion|
Coaster Count: 300
#26
Posted 03 January 2009 - 11:30 PM
^Yeah I was going to build a tube supported invert any way ,but he gave me a boost.
><>
It's safe to say that I'm not exactly pleased with my works so far.
#27
Posted 04 January 2009 - 12:04 AM
You might want to try making the lateral supports on either side of the loop a little skinnier, like this. I know, it's a B+M invert, but you can see how the supports go out, not straight down.
It would probably be really strenuous on the riders because of the pressure against the harnesses, but otherwise, it looks fantastic.
#28
Posted 04 January 2009 - 01:05 AM
Straining is what it's all about >: )
#29
Posted 04 January 2009 - 08:42 AM
-MIBB)
#30
Posted 04 January 2009 - 09:32 AM
^^lol not if its an inverted flier. now I don't know if they never really do loops like that but if not I'm the first one. thanks.
Your dumb, ALL vekoma flyers have loops on the inside, not out, and you can't come back saying "oh it's a B&M flyer now" because they don't have loops, they have pretzles. Change it. looks horrid anyway.
-CA
Thanks Immelmann
#31
Posted 04 January 2009 - 10:14 AM
Let him call it "Custom" flier
#32
Posted 04 January 2009 - 11:22 AM
^thanks ,but I had no idea that they didn't do that in real life.
#33
Posted 04 January 2009 - 11:31 AM
thanx CC10
#34
Posted 04 January 2009 - 12:21 PM
steelspectrum was responding to the supports as a b&m not the coaster.
I know he was the only one that even mentioned B&M
A little bit of an update.
I am going to do a sidewinder and then coming off the side winder will be a elevated corkscrew that will get t back uninverted then it will suddenly dive down into a half loop and do something els.
#35
Posted 04 January 2009 - 01:47 PM
thanx CC10
#36
Posted 04 January 2009 - 06:48 PM
#37
Posted 04 January 2009 - 07:32 PM
Well, it's not really an argument, really just a disagreement...nevermind.
V..READ THIS!..V not that.^ummm...yeah.
IMO, it would be really ugly for you to have half the ride be inverted elements on a flyer, 'custom' or not. Maybe you could do a half-zeroG roll, like on X (SFMM), to get it verted again or something, that might look cool...
#38
Posted 06 January 2009 - 11:19 AM
Update.
don't worry about the second cork screw I didn't realize it looked that bad until I took the pictures I know how to fix it.
#39
Posted 06 January 2009 - 11:27 AM
Nice
#40
Posted 06 January 2009 - 01:55 PM